PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2116 / 117th Congress

CROWN Act of 2022

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Mar 18, 2022

Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair Act of 2022 or the CROWN Act of 2022

This bill prohibits discrimination based on a person's hair texture or hairstyle if that style or texture is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin. Specifically, the bill prohibits this type of discrimination against those participating in federally assisted programs, housing programs, public accommodations, and employment.

Persons shall not be deprived of equal rights under the law and shall not be subjected to prohibited practices based on their hair texture or style.

The bill provides for enforcement procedures under the applicable laws.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Budget Committee
  • Education and Workforce Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
116 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 235 - 189 (Roll no. 82). (text: CR H3833-3834)

    House roll call 82 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 235 - 189 (Roll no. 82).

    House roll call 82 · Individual votes
  5. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2116.

  7. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116. The rule provides for one hour of general debate on both H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116.

  8. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 979. (consideration: CR H3833-3842)

  9. Rule H. Res. 979 passed House.

  10. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 979 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116. The rule provides for one hour of general debate on both H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116.

  11. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 235 - 188 (Roll no. 48). (text: CR H1160-1162)

    House roll call 48 · Individual votes
  12. Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 235 - 188 (Roll no. 48).(text: CR H1160-1162)

    House roll call 48 · Individual votes
  13. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1172-1173)

  14. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2116.

  16. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1160-1166)

  17. Mr. Nadler moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  18. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 182.

  19. Committee on the Budget discharged.

  20. Committee on the Budget discharged.

  21. Committee on Education and Labor discharged.

  22. Committee on Education and Labor discharged.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-252, Part I.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-252, Part I.

  25. Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.

  26. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 15.

  27. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  28. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  29. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  30. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  31. Introduced in House

  32. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2116 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2116 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2116 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2116 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources