PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2115 / 106th Congress

Medicare Purchasing Flexibility Act of 1999

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 9, 1999

Medicare Purchasing Flexibility Act of 1999 - Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct specified demonstration projects to: (1) improve the quality of items and services furnished under the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (SSA); and (2) reduce Medicare expenditures for such items and services. Provides for funding such demonstration projects.(Sec. 3) Directs the Secretary, in the case of unusual increases in Medicare costs attributable to unjustified increases in the amount or intensity of such items and services, to modify the payment update and-or methodology with respect to such items and services to one that imposes a sustainable growth rate similar to that applied with respect to payment for physician services under Medicare.(Sec. 4) Authorizes the Secretary, in the case of a service area in which payments to a health care provider for such items and services represent the largest single source of payment to the provider for such items and services in that area, to negotiate a preferred customer rate with such provider.Requires the Secretary, for such a service area where Medicare payment rates for items and services exceed the rates charged by the provider for payment made other than under Medicare, to negotiate a preferred customer rate with such health care provider.Raises from 15 percent to 30 percent of the preceding year's payment the limitation on the increase or decrease in payment for a particular item or service with respect to factors for the determination that a payment, except in certain circumstances, is not inherently reasonable.(Sec. 5) Amends SSA title XVIII to provide for basing Medicare payment under the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospital outpatient department services on payment rates for similar services provided outside the hospital setting.(Sec. 6) Directs the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission to report to Congress and the Secretary on whether diagnosis-related group (DRG) weighting factors for DRG's associated with emergency care are adequate to cover the costs of emergency room use within discharges classified within such DRG's. Directs the Secretary to make appropriate adjustments in such DRG weighting factors for discharges occurring on or after January 1, 2001, to ensure that hospital emergency room costs attributable to Medicare patients are appropriately covered.(Sec. 7) Allows the Secretary, upon estimating that treatment in a non-hospital or -institutional setting under Medicare is likely to provide similar or better quality care and outcomes at a lower cost to the program, to waive specified requirements which discourage or prevent treatment in such a setting. Prohibits the Secretary from providing for such a waiver in the case of an individual unless there are satisfactory assurances that the Medicare beneficiary has not received (and is not likely to receive) Medicare benefits for hospital services for the treatment with respect to which the waiver applies.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13] · D–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health and Environment.

    2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

    3. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    4. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    5. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    6. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1187-1188)

    7. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E959)

    8. Introduced in House

    9. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2115 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2115 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2115 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2115 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources