PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 9, 1999
Drug Kingpins Bankruptcy Act of 1999 - Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to report annually to the Director of National Drug Control Policy the names of foreign international narcotics traffickers. Requires the President to determine annually whether or not such persons constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and to forward their names to the Secretary of the Treasury.Declares that Congress finds that a national emergency exists with respect to any individual who is designated a narcotics trafficker.Provides for the blocking (freeze) of assets that come within the possession or control of the United States, and are assets of: (1) any designated narcotics trafficker; (2) any person who materially assists in the narcotics trafficking activities of a designated narcotics trafficker; and (3) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be owned or controlled by, or to act for or on behalf of, a designated narcotics trafficker.Sets forth specified prohibited acts, including any transaction or dealing by a U.S. person (or within the United States): (1) in property or interests in property of a designated narcotics trafficker; and (2) that evades or attempts to violate the requirements of this Act. Authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to take such actions (including the promulgation of rules and regulations) and to employ all powers granted to the President by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to carry out this Act.Directs the President to designate as specially designated narcotic traffickers certain named persons who have been indicted in the United States on narcotics trafficking charges and whose extradition has been requested by U.S. Government officials.Directs the Secretary of State to deny a visa to, and the Attorney General not to admit to the United States, any: (1) designated narcotics trafficker; or (2) alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is a spouse or minor child of such trafficker, or is a person who materially assists, or is owned or controlled by, a designated narcotics trafficker. Sets forth specified exceptions.
People & committees
Rep. McCollum, Bill [R-FL-8] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.
Referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1191-1193)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2105 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2105 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2105 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2105 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.