To provide amnesty from criminal and civil tax penalties for individuals who, within the 6-month amnesty period, notify the Internal Revenue Service of previous nonpayments or underpayments of Federal income tax and pay such underpayments in full.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 20, 1995
Provides that an individual shall not be liable for any criminal or civil penalty or additional amount of tax respecting any underpayment of Federal income tax for any taxable year, subject to stated exceptions, if, during the amnesty period, such individual: (1) files a written statement with the Secretary of the Treasury; and (2) agrees to a waiver of any restriction on the assessment or collection of such underpayment. Requires that an individual pay: (1) the amount of underpayment shown on such statement; and (2) the full amount of the interest payable respecting such underpayment not later than 90 days after notification by the Secretary of the amount of such interest or any other date agreed to by the Secretary and the individual before the end of the 90-day period. Limits provisions for which amnesty is available to underpayments of Federal income tax for taxable years ending before January 1994.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2079 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2079 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2079 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2079 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.