PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 104-27.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 20, 1995
Designates the U.S. Post Office building located at 33 College Avenue in Waterville, Maine, as the George J. Mitchell Post Office Building.
People & committees
Rep. Longley, James B., Jr. [R-ME-1] · R–ME
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 104-27.
Became Public Law No: 104-27.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S12111)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S12111)
Received in the Senate, read twice.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection.
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H8507-8508)
Mr. McHugh asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on Government Reform discharged.
Committee on Government Reform discharged.
Committee on Transportation discharged.
Rereferred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Committee on Transportation discharged.
Mr. McHugh asked unanimous consent that the bill be rereferred from the Committee on Transportation to the Committee on Government Reform. Agreed to without objection.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Economic Development.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2077 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2077 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2077 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2077 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.