PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on the Census.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 8, 1999
Military Personnel Home of Record Act of 1999 - Requires the Secretary of Commerce to ensure that, for purposes of the 2000 census: (1) members of the armed forces on active duty shall be allocated to their home of record, legal residence, or last permanent duty station in the United States, in that order of priority; and (2) any dependents of such a member assigned to a permanent duty station outside of the United States who are residing with such member shall be allocated to their last State or U.S. territory of residence, except that, if such dependent never resided in the United States (or a U.S. territory) and is a U.S. citizen, such dependent shall be allocated in the same manner as applies to such member.
People & committees
Rep. Ryan, Paul [R-WI-1] · R–WI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Census.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1164-1165)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.2067 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.2067 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.2067 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.2067 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.