PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2040 / 108th Congress

To amend the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to extend certain contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and certain irrigation water contractors in the States of Wyoming and Nebraska.

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.

Official summary

Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Sep 16, 2003

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Amends the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to provide for the extension of water service or repayment contracts for the Glendo Unit of the Missouri River Basin Project and the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research and other Efforts Relating to Endangered Species Habitats Along the Central Platte River, Nebraska, until December 31, 2005.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Osborne, Tom [R-NE-3] · R–NE

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.

    2. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    4. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8229-8230)

    5. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8229-8230)

    6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2040.

    7. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8229-8230)

    8. Mr. Calvert moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 148.

    10. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 108-259.

    11. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 108-259.

    12. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    13. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    14. Subcommittee on Water and Power Discharged.

    15. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    16. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

    17. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water and Power.

    18. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

    19. Introduced in House

    20. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.2040 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.2040 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.2040 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.2040 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources