NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997

See H.R.2400.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 7, 1997

NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997 - Authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to make grants to Mexican border States and local governments for certain transportation projects necessary to: (1) relieve congestion due to increased traffic resulting from implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA); and (2) improve enforcement of motor carrier safety laws. Limits the Federal share of the costs of such projects to 80 percent. Authorizes appropriations. Amends the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 to authorize the use of appropriations to enter into agreements with Mexican border States that have established infrastructure banks to make lines of credit available to them for projects to construct Federal-aid highways which will support traffic resulting from NAFTA.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Kim, Jay [R-CA-41] · R–CA

Committees

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Bilbray, Brian P. [R-CA-49]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jun 9, 1998
See H.R.2400.
Feb 13, 1997
Referred to the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation.
Jan 7, 1997
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Jan 7, 1997
Introduced in House
Jan 7, 1997
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Jan 7, 1997 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 2400 · Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century

Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.204 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.204, 105th Congress: NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/204

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr204/BILLS-105hr204ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.204 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.204 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.204, 105th Congress: NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/204

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr204/BILLS-105hr204ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.204 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.204 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.204, 105th Congress: NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/204

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr204/BILLS-105hr204ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.204 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.204 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.204, 105th Congress: NAFTA Infrastructure Responsibility Act of 1997

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/204

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-01-07.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr204/BILLS-105hr204ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-21T16:14:35Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.204 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.