PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2036 / 105th Congress

Aviation Insurance Reauthorization Act of 1997

For Further Action See S.1193.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 25, 1997

Aviation Insurance Reauthorization Act of 1997 - Amends Federal aviation law with respect to aviation insurance to require the Secretary of Transportation to determine the reasonable value of an aircraft, for insurance purposes, in accordance with reasonable business practices in the commercial aviation insurance industry. Authorizes the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, upon notification of the Congress, to issue and sell notes or other obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury to carry out Federal aviation insurance and reinsurance programs. Authorizes appropriations for such borrowing authority. Declares that aviation insurance policies issued by the Secretary of Transportation may authorize the binding arbitration of claims made under them. Authorizes the Secretary to pay the amount of any binding arbitration award. Extends Federal aviation insurance and reinsurance programs through FY 2002.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Shuster, Bud [R-PA-9] · R–PA

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. For Further Action See S.1193.

  2. Laid on the table. See S. 1193 for further action. (consideration: CR H10945)

  3. At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Condit objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.

  4. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  5. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8092-8094)

  6. Mr. Kim moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  7. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 140.

  8. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 105-244.

  9. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 105-244.

  10. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  11. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  12. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  13. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  14. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Aviation Prior to Introduction (May 1, 97).

  15. Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

  16. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  17. Introduced in House

  18. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2036 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2036 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2036 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2036 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources