Farm Credit System Regulatory Relief Act of 1995 - Amends the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to extend the length of time between required Farm Credit Administration examinations of Farm Credit System (FCS) institutions. (Sec. 5) Directs the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) to allocate Farm Credit Insurance Fund excess interest earnings to FCS banks. (Sec. 6) Requires FCSIC to implement the least-cost alternative, including liquidation, in providing assistance to troubled FCS banks. (Sec. 8) States that FCSIC may act as conservator or receiver of a FCS institution. (Sec. 9) Sets forth specified FCSIC oversight and regulatory authority, including regulation of golden parachute and indemnification payments. (Sec. 10) Permits FCS associations to establish administrative service entities. (Sec. 11) Sets forth specified requirements for secondary market loan sales, including borrowers' rights. (Sec. 12) Revises certain paperwork, private sector certification, and operating provisions.
Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S531-538)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S531-538)
Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H33-48)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H33-48)
Mr. Emerson asked unanimous consent that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendments.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 3109 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 3109 proposed by Senator Santorum for Senator Lugar.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S19138-19140)
Senate Committee on Agriculture discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Agriculture discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H15162-15166)
Mr. Allard moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 207.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 104-421.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 104-421.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held. Hearings Printed: H. Hrg. 104-20.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Resource Conservation, Research and Forestry.
Executive Comment Requested from Farm Credit Admin.
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1429)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.2029 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.2029 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.2029 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.2029 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.