PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.2005 / 105th Congress

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of the Act popularly known as the "Death on the High Seas Act" to aviation incidents.

Subcommittee on Surface Transportation. Hearings held.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Jul 28, 1997

Amends Federal aviation law to declare that, after enactment of this Act, the Death on the High Seas Act does not apply to aircraft or to the navigation of vessels related to those aircraft. Amends the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 to specify that the Secretary of Transportation's family assistance task force report to the Congress shall contain the task force's guidelines (not, as currently, "model plan") to assist air carriers in responding to aircraft accidents.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McDade, Joseph M. [R-PA-10] · R–PA

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
48 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Subcommittee on Surface Transportation. Hearings held.

  2. Committee on Commerce. Hearings held.

  3. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  4. Received in the Senate.

  5. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  6. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  7. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  8. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  9. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  10. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5843-5845)

  11. Mr. Duncan moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  12. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 123.

  13. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 105-201.

  14. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 105-201.

  15. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  16. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  18. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  19. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  20. Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.

  21. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  22. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1282)

  23. Introduced in House

  24. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.2005 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.2005 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.2005 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.2005 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources