PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 30, 1995
Efficient Fleet Management Act of 1995 - Amends the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to issue rules which establish procedures for Federal agency award of contracts for the procurement of property and services related to motor vehicle pools and systems. Prohibits an agency from procuring such property and services except: (1) under a contract awarded under competitive procedures; and (2) subject to the supervision of the Director. Authorizes, under specified conditions, the head of an agency to use Government personnel to operate a motor vehicle fleet of the agency rather than contracting for the procurement of motor vehicle fleet services from private sector sources only if there are demonstrated greater cost-efficiencies achieved by agency operation of the fleet. Requires the amount expended by all agencies for FY 1996 through 2000 for the operation of motor vehicle pools and systems to be reduced by $200 million (or approximately ten percent) below the amount expended by them for such operation in FY 1995.
People & committees
Rep. Franks, Bob [R-NJ-7] · R–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1372-1373)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1981 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1981 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1981 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1981 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.