PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1954 / 108th Congress

Naturalization and Family Protection for Military Members Act of 2003

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 142.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 6, 2003

Armed Forces Naturalization Act of 2003 - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act respecting naturalization through service in the armed forces to: (1) reduce the required service from three years to one year; and (2) prohibit the imposition of a naturalization fee.Provides for overseas naturalization proceedings for members of the armed forces.Amends the Act to retain, with specified filing deadlines, immediate relative status for the alien spouse, child, or parent of a person granted posthumous U.S. citizenship through death from injury or disease incurred while serving honorably on active military service during a period of hostilities. Permits self-petitions for immigrant status. Waives public charge grounds of inadmissibility. Prohibits the imposition of related fees.Treats the alien spouse, child, or parent of a U.S. citizen who died from injury or disease incurred while serving honorably on active military service during a period of hostilities as a valid petitioner for immediate family status. Permits surviving child or parent self-petitions for immigrant status. Waives public charge grounds of inadmissibility.Replaces specified references to the "Attorney General" with the "Secretary of Homeland Security."Makes the provisions of this Act, except fee-related provisions, effective as if enacted on September 11, 2001.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [R-WI-5] · R–WI

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
17 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 142.

  2. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  3. Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Hatch with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.

  4. Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  6. Received in the Senate.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 414 - 5 (Roll no. 239). (text: CR H4899-4901)

    House roll call 239 · Individual votes
  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 414 - 5 (Roll no. 239).(text: CR H4899-4901)

    House roll call 239 · Individual votes
  10. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4921)

  11. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1954.

  13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4899-4910)

  14. Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  15. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 57.

  16. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 108-111.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 108-111.

  18. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  20. Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims Discharged.

  21. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.

  22. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  23. Introduced in House

  24. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1954 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1954 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1954 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1954 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources