PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1944 / 103rd Congress

To provide for additional development at War in the Pacific National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 103-197.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jul 21, 1993

Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) an appropriate commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the Mariana campaign of World War II should be planned; and (2) the Secretary of the Interior should take steps to ensure the completion of two visitor centers, one at the War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam (Park), and one at the American Memorial Park, Saipan, before June 15, 1994, the beginning of the 50th anniversary of the campaign. Increases the authorization of appropriations for each Park.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Del. Underwood, Robert A. [D-GU-At Large] · D–GU

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
31 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-197.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-197.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S16993)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S16993)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H10608-10610)

  13. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H10608-10610)

  14. Mr. Vento asked unanimous consent that the House agree with an amendment to the Senate amendment.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S9182-9183)

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S9182-9183)

  18. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 143.

  19. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-98.

  20. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-98.

  21. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported in lieu of S. 971 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  22. Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.

  23. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  24. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  25. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  26. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  27. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  28. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3852-3854)

  29. Mr. Vento moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  30. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 80.

  31. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-145.

  32. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-145.

  33. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  34. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  35. See Subcommittee Action Prior to Referral.

  36. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

  37. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Held by the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands; Forwarded by the Subcommittee to the Full Committee (Amended) Prior to Referral (Jun 10, 93).

  38. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Prior to Referral (May 27, 93).

  39. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  40. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2178-2179)

  41. Introduced in House

  42. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1944 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1944 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1944 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1944 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources