PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1927 / 106th Congress

Social Security and Medicare Lock-box Act of 1999

Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 25, 1999

Social Security and Medicare Lock-box Act of 1999 - Amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make it out of order in the House of Representatives or the Senate, until there is both a social security solvency certification and a Medicare solvency certification, to consider any concurrent budget resolution (or related conference report or amendment) that would use any portion of the baseline budget surpluses or any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report if the enactment of such legislation or amendment (or enactment of legislation in the form recommended in the conference report) would use any portion of such surpluses. Defines: (1) "baseline budget surplus" as the sum of the on- and off-budget surpluses contained in the most recent baseline budget projections by the Congressional Budget Office at the beginning of the annual budget cycle and no later than the month of March; (2) "social security solvency certification" as a certification by the Board of Trustees of the social security trust funds that the Federal Old-Age and Survivors and Disability Insurance Trust Funds are, taken together, in actuarial balance for the 75-year period utilized in a specified Board of Trustees annual report; and (3) "Medicare solvency certification" as a certification by the Board of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance Fund that such fund is in actuarial balance for the 30-year period utilized in a specified Board of Trustees annual report. Declares that a portion of such surpluses is used if, relative to the baseline budget projection in the case of: (1) legislation affecting revenues, any net reduction in revenues in the current or budget year, or over the five or ten-year estimating periods beginning with the budget year, is not offset by reductions in direct spending; (2) legislation affecting direct spending, any net increase in such spending in the current or budget year, or over such five or ten-year periods, is not offset by increases in revenues; and (3) an appropriations bill, there is a net increase in discretionary outlays in the current or budget year when the discretionary outlays from such bill are added to the outlays from all previously enacted appropriations bills. Waives or suspends the point of order provided in this Act in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members. Requires the same majority to sustain an appeal of a ruling of the Chair on such point of order.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Holt, Rush [D-NJ-12] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Rules Committee
  • Budget Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1092)

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1927 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1927 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1927 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1927 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources