PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1922 / 119th Congress

Ensuring Access to Essential Drugs Act

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 6, 2025

Ensuring Access to Essential Drugs Act

This bill exempts certain brand-name drugs from the Medicare Part D Manufacturer Discount Program. Under the program, drug manufacturers provide discounts to beneficiaries who have incurred costs above the annual deductible under the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

Specifically, the bill exempts from the program orally administered, brand-name drugs that are considered generics for purposes of the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (per an exception granted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2] · R–NY

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Feb 13, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1922 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1922 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1922 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1922 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 5, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-06 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This bill would exempt a narrowly defined group of drugs taken by mouth from Medicare Part D’s manufacturer discount program, affecting manufacturers of qualifying drugs. Eligibility would depend on both approval through a new drug application and a special federal exception allowing a different classification under Medicaid’s drug rebate program.

Check the sources
2. Exempting certain drugs from the part D manufacturer discount program under the Medicare program
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06
(C) does not include an orally administered drug— (i) for which a new drug application was approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and (ii) that has been granted a narrow exception permitting reclassification as a noninnovator multiple source drug under the Medicaid drug rebate program by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06

How it would work

Section 2 would add an exclusion to section 1860D–14C(g)(2) of the Social Security Act. A drug must be taken by mouth and meet both conditions: approval of a new drug application under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and an exception already granted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services permitting reclassification as a “noninnovator multiple source drug”—a classification used in Medicaid’s drug rebate program. The proposal would rely on that classification exception rather than itself grant one.

Check the sources
Section 1860D–14C(g)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–114c(g)(2)) is amended—
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) does not include an orally administered drug— (i) for which a new drug application was approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and (ii) that has been granted a narrow exception permitting reclassification as a noninnovator multiple source drug under the Medicaid drug rebate program by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated February 13, 2026, records introduction in the House on March 6, 2025, and referral that day to the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees for consideration of provisions within their respective jurisdictions.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-02-13T21:03:05Z.
Official legislative record · 2026-02-13T21:03:05Z
2025-03-06: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-02-13T21:03:05Z
2025-03-06: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2026-02-13T21:03:05Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-06. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for a particular recipient or place was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The proposed narrow exemption warrants scrutiny as targeted treatment. This classification does not establish that the exemption is unjustified.

Manufacturers of qualifying orally administered drugs would receive a narrow exemption from the Medicare Part D manufacturer discount program. Eligibility requires both an approved new drug application and a specific federal exception permitting Medicaid rebate reclassification. This preferential treatment is the bill’s central policy.

Check the sources
2. Exempting certain drugs from the part D manufacturer discount program under the Medicare program
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06
(C) does not include an orally administered drug— (i) for which a new drug application was approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and (ii) that has been granted a narrow exception permitting reclassification as a noninnovator multiple source drug under the Medicaid drug rebate program by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-06

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The complete introduced bill is supplied, but the existing statutory provision it would amend is not reproduced. The bundle therefore does not establish the full definition being amended, surrounding exceptions, or how the manufacturer discount program operates.
  • The introduced text specifies no implementation date, expiration date, or new enforcement procedures. Existing statutory rules that might govern these matters are not supplied.
  • The bundle does not identify qualifying drugs or manufacturers, explain the underlying classification exception, or establish effects on patient costs, drug access, or government spending.
  • The dated actions snapshot supplies introduction and committee referrals but does not establish subsequent progress or enactment. Its lack of later actions does not prove that the bill never advanced or became law.
  • Earmark disclosures, committee reports, and other accompanying materials are not supplied, limiting assessment beyond the introduced text.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Feb 13, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI