Depository Institution Consumer Protection Act of 1997
Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 17, 1997
Depository Institution Consumer Protection Act of 1997 - Amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to require each Federal banking agency to prescribe consumer protection regulations pertaining to the sales, solicitations, advertising, or offers of a nondeposit product by a retail depository institution (including its affiliates, subsidiaries, and persons engaged in such activities at an institution office, or on its behalf). Encompasses within the ambit of such regulations: (1) anticoercion sales and product marketing rules; (2) product suitability; (3) mandatory disclosure of the non-insured and non-guaranteed status of a nondeposit product, including investment risks; (4) prohibition of misrepresentation; (5) physical segregation of banking and nonbanking activities; (6) sales personnel qualification requirements and training; and (7) the structuring of compensation programs with respect to nondeposit product referral or sales incentives. Directs Federal banking regulators to jointly establish a consumer enforcement mechanism for expeditious consumer complaint resolution. Proscribes the use of a deposit institution name or logo in connection with a nondeposit product serviced by such institution. Sets forth safeguards relating to confidential consumer financial information.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1900 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1900 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1900 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1900 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.