PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1893 / 119th Congress

LIONs Act of 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13] · D–MI

Committees

  • Small Business Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 22, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1893 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1893 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1893 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1893 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 6, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-05 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposal would raise dollar limits for two types of business loans: 7(a) loans and development company loans. It would double the listed 7(a) limits and increase the listed development company loan limits to $10 million. These changes concern maximum loan amounts for businesses seeking loans through these programs.

Check the sources
Section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(3)(A)) is amended by striking $3,750,000 (or if the gross loan amount would exceed $5,000,000) and inserting $7,500,000 (or if the gross loan amount would exceed $10,000,000).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-05
3. Maximum loan amount for a development company loan Section 502(2)(A) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(2)(A)) is amended— (1) by striking $5,000,000 each place it appears and inserting $10,000,000; and (2) by striking $5,500,000 each place it appears and inserting $10,000,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-05

How it would work

For 7(a) loans, section 2 would replace $3.75 million with $7.5 million in the specified statutory provision. It would also raise the accompanying gross loan amount threshold—the total loan amount—from $5 million to $10 million. The surrounding statute is not reproduced, so the supplied text does not fully explain how the two limits operate together.

Check the source
Section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(3)(A)) is amended by striking $3,750,000 (or if the gross loan amount would exceed $5,000,000) and inserting $7,500,000 (or if the gross loan amount would exceed $10,000,000).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-05

For development company loans, section 3 would replace every occurrence of $5 million and $5.5 million within the specified statutory provision with $10 million. The supplied text does not reproduce the existing rules identifying which loans fall under each amount.

Check the source
Section 502(2)(A) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 696(2)(A)) is amended— (1) by striking $5,000,000 each place it appears and inserting $10,000,000; and (2) by striking $5,500,000 each place it appears and inserting $10,000,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-05

What the record shows

The supplied action snapshot, updated January 22, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Small Business on March 5, 2025. It does not establish the bill's subsequent progress or enactment.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-01-22T09:06:11Z. 2025-03-05: Referred to the House Committee on Small Business. 2025-03-05: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-01-22T09:06:11Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-05. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied March 5, 2025 introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential exception was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not treat ordinary program coverage as a targeted benefit.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The complete supplied introduced text proposes amendments; it is not evidence that those amendments became law. The dated action snapshot does not establish whether later legislative action occurred.
  • The underlying statutory provisions are not reproduced. Their eligibility requirements, exceptions, treatment of government guarantees, and administration cannot be fully explained from this bundle.
  • The supplied bill specifies no separate implementation date, termination condition, or new enforcement mechanism.
  • No member earmark requests, disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jan 22, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI