PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 20, 1999
Small Business Review Panel Technical Amendments Act of 1999 - Amends Federal provisions concerning the promulgation of Federal rules to allow representatives of small entities that may be affected to make an oral presentation to a review panel for a proposed rule. Requires the head of an agency covered by the rule to print the report of the review panel in the Federal Register within 120 days after receiving it or as part of the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking.
People & committees
Rep. Talent, Jim [R-MO-2] · R–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 7, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 5, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 14, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 4, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 3, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 2, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 1, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 31, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 30, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 29, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 28, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 27, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 26, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 25, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 20, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 13, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 6, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 29, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 26, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 25, 2000.
House Committee on Ways and Means Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 19, 2000.
Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Ways and Means for a period ending not later than Sept. 15, 2000 for consideration of such provisions of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(s), rule X.
Reported by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 106-643, Part I.
Reported by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 106-643, Part I.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1882 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1882 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1882 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1882 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.