PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1872 / 115th Congress

Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018

Became Public Law No: 115-330.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 19, 2018

Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act of 2018

This bill requires the Department of State to report to Congress annually regarding the level of access Chinese authorities granted U.S. diplomats, journalists, and tourists to Tibetan areas in China. Such assessment shall include:

a comparison with the level of access granted to other areas of China,

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

a comparison between the levels of access granted to Tibetan and non-Tibetan areas in relevant provinces,

a comparison of the level of access in the reporting year and the previous year, and

a description of the measures that impede the freedom to travel in Tibetan areas.

No individual who is substantially involved in the formulation or execution of policies related to access for foreigners to Tibetan areas may enter the United States if:

the requirement that foreigners must receive official permission to enter the Tibet Autonomous Region remains in effect, or has been replaced by a similar regulation that also requires foreigners to gain a level of permission to enter the Tibet Autonomous Region that is not required for other provinces; and

travel restrictions on U.S. diplomats, officials, journalists, and citizens to Tibet Autonomous areas in Sichuan, Qinghai, Yunnan, and Gansu Provinces are greater than travel restrictions to other areas.

The State Department shall report to Congress annually, identifying individuals who were blocked from U.S. entry during the preceding year and a list of Chinese officials who were substantially involved in the formulation or execution of policies to restrict the access of U.S. diplomats, journalists, and citizens to Tibetan areas.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] · D–MA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
55 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 115-330.

  2. Became Public Law No: 115-330.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S7453)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S7453)

  10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 701.

  11. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker without amendment. Without written report.

  12. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Corker without amendment. Without written report.

  13. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  14. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  15. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  17. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8849-8850)

  18. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8849-8850)

  19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1872.

  20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8849-8853)

  21. Mr. Rutherford moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  22. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  24. Referred to the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific.

  25. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3005-3006)

  26. Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

  27. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  28. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  29. Introduced in House

  30. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1872 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1872 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1872 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1872 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources