PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1831 / 114th Congress

Evidence-Based Policymaking Commission Act of 2016

Became Public Law No: 114-140.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Mar 16, 2016

Evidence-Based Policymaking Commission Act of 2016

(Sec. 2) This bill establishes in the executive branch a Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking.

(Sec. 3) The bill sets forth the membership composition, terms, and compensation of the Commission and requires the appointment of experts in protecting personally-identifiable information and data minimization. Consideration shall also be given in the appointment process to individuals with expertise in economics, statistics, program evaluation, data security, confidentiality, or database management.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

(Sec. 4) The Commission shall conduct a comprehensive study of the data inventory, data infrastructure, database security, and statistical protocols related to federal policymaking and the agencies responsible for maintaining that data to:

determine the optimal arrangement for which administrative data on federal programs and tax expenditures, survey data, and related statistical data series may be integrated and made available to facilitate program evaluation, continuous improvement, policy-relevant research, and cost-benefit analyses while weighing how integration might lead to the intentional or unintentional access, breach, or release of personally-identifiable information or records;

make recommendations on how data infrastructure, database security, and statistical protocols should be modified to best fulfill those objectives; and

make recommendations on how best to incorporate outcomes measurement, institutionalize randomized controlled trials, and rigorous impact analysis into program design.

The Commission shall consider whether a clearinghouse for program and survey data should be established and how to create such clearinghouse. The Commission shall evaluate:

what administrative data and survey data are relevant for program evaluation and federal policy-making and should be included in a clearinghouse;

which survey data such administrative data may be linked to, in addition to linkages across administrative data series, including the effect such linkages may have on the security of those data;

what are the legal and administrative barriers to including or linking these data series;

what data-sharing infrastructure should be used to facilitate data merging and access for research purposes;

how a clearinghouse could be self-funded;

which researchers, officials, and institutions should have access to data and their qualifications;

what limitations should be placed on the use of data;

how to protect information and ensure individual privacy and confidentiality;

how data and results of research can be used to inform program administrators and policymakers to improve program design;

what incentives may facilitate interagency sharing of information to improve programmatic effectiveness and enhance data accuracy and comprehensiveness; and

how individuals whose data are used should be notified of its usages.

The Commission shall, upon the affirmative vote of at least three-quarters of its members, submit to the President and Congress a detailed statement of its findings and conclusions, together with its recommendations for appropriate legislation or administrative actions.

(Sec. 5) The following agencies shall advise and consult with the Commission on matters within their respective areas of responsibility:

the Bureau of the Census;

the Internal Revenue Service;

the Social Security Administration;

the Departments of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Housing and Urban Development, Education, and Justice;

the Office of Management and Budget;

the Bureau of Economic Analysis;

the Bureau of Labor Statistics; and

any other agency, as determined by the Commission.

(Sec. 6) The bill requires: (1) the agencies identified as Principal Statistical Agencies in the report entitled "Statistical Programs of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2015," published by the Office of Management and Budget, to transfer up to $3 million to the Bureau of the Census, upon request, for carrying out the activities of the Commission; and (2) the Bureau to provide administrative support to the Commission.

No additional funds may be authorized to carry out this Act.

(Sec. 7) The Commission shall have a Director appointed by the chairperson with the concurrence of the co-chairperson.

(Sec. 8) The Commission shall terminate not later than 18 months after the enactment of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Ryan, Paul D. [R-WI-1] · R–WI

Committees

  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 114-140.

  2. Became Public Law No: 114-140.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H1446-1447)

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H1446-1447)

  10. Mr. Hurd (TX) asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.

  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  14. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S1548)

  15. Received in the Senate, read twice.

  16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  17. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5486-5487)

  18. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5486-5487)

  19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1831.

  20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5486-5488)

  21. Mr. Chaffetz moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  22. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 159.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 114-211.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 114-211.

  25. Committee Hearings Held.

  26. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  27. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  28. Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

  29. Introduced in House

  30. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Nov 6, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1831 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1831 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1831 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1831 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources