PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1816 / 104th Congress

Department of Energy Civilian Research and Development Act of 1995

House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 4, 1996.

Official summary

Version 18 · Reported to House amended, Part I · Aug 4, 1995

Department of Energy Civilian Research and Development Act of 1995 - Authorizes FY 1996 appropriations for Department of Energy: (1) energy supply research and development activities; (2) general science and research activities; (3) fossil energy research and development activities; and (4) energy conservation research and development activities. Sets forth funding limitations. Establishes requirements for: (1) funding assistance merit review; and (2) capital project and construction reporting. Directs the Secretary of Energy to enter into negotiations with the European Organization for Nuclear Research concerning U.S. participation in the planning and construction of the Large Hadron Collider. Prohibits any funds authorized by this Act from being used for lobbying activities.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Rohrabacher, Dana [R-CA-45] · R–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 4, 1996.

  2. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Aug. 1, 1996.

  3. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than July 1, 1996.

  4. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Jan. 12, 1996.

  5. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Jan. 4, 1996.

  6. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Jan. 3, 1996.

  7. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 15, 1995.

  8. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Dec. 1, 1995.

  9. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 17, 1995.

  10. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 2, 1995.

  11. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 1, 1995.

  12. For Further Action See H.R.2405.

  13. House Committee on Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Sept. 29, 1995.

  14. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Chairman.

  15. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Commerce for a period ending not later than Sept. 22, 1995 for consideration of such provisions in the bill and amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(e), rule X.

  16. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 104-236.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 104-236.

  18. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.

  19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  22. Referred to the House Committee on Science.

  23. Introduced in House

  24. Introduced in House

  25. Consideration and Mark-up Session Held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction.

  26. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction.

  27. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction.

  28. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment Prior to Introduction.

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1816 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1816 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1816 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1816 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources