PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1810 / 113th Congress

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Gasparilla Island Unit in Florida.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 475.

Official summary

Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · Dec 1, 2014

Revises the boundaries of the Gasparilla Island Unit FL-70P in the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System in Florida.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Radel, Trey [R-FL-19] · R–FL

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 475.

    2. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-635.

    3. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-635.

    4. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    6. Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular Affairs Discharged.

    7. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

    8. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans, and Insular Affairs.

    9. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    10. Introduced in House

    11. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1810 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1810 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1810 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1810 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources