PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1779 / 103rd Congress

An Act to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as the "Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office Building", and to authorize travel and transportation expenses for certain Federal career appointees, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 103-338.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 21, 1993

Designates the U.S. Postal Service facility located at 401 South Washington Street, Chillicothe, Missouri, as the Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office Building.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Danner, Pat [D-MO-6] · D–MO

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Post Office and Civil Service Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 103-338.

    2. Became Public Law No: 103-338.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Senate agreed to the House amendments to the Senate amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S13087)

    9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendments to the Senate amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S13087)

    10. Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk: House amendments to Senate amendments.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On motion that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H9179)

    13. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H9179)

    14. Ms. Norton asked unanimous consent that the House agree with amendments to the Senate amendments.

    15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    16. Passed Senate with amendments and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.

    17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.

    18. Amendment SP 2573 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

    19. Amendment SP 2573 proposed by Senator Sarbanes for Senator Pryor.

    20. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12209-12210)

    21. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 563.

    22. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Glenn with an amendment and an amendment to the title. Without written report.

    23. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Glenn with an amendment and an amendment to the title. Without written report.

    24. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

    25. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    26. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    27. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    28. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

    29. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    30. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2696-2698)

    31. Miss Collins (MI) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    32. Ordered to be Reported.

    33. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    34. Referred to the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services.

    35. Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    36. Introduced in House

    37. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1779 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1779 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1779 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1779 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources