Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 3, 2025
Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act
This bill allows additional hospitals to qualify as rural emergency hospitals (REHs) under Medicare.
In 2020, Congress established REHs as a new Medicare provider designation for hospitals in rural areas providing emergency department services, observation care, and other outpatient medical and health services for which the annual per patient average length of stay does not exceed 24 hours. These hospitals must have been open as of December 27, 2020, in order to qualify for the new REH designation.
The bill allows hospitals that were open between January 1, 2014, and December 26, 2020, to also qualify for the REH designation, and it provides for a specific payment structure for these hospitals. The bill's changes take effect beginning in 2027.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 17, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1775 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1775 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1775 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1775 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 4, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposed Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act would let certain closed hospitals qualify as rural emergency hospitals under Medicare. It would cover facilities that operated in specified hospital categories during 2014–2020 and had closed by enactment, with exceptions to some existing requirements. These facilities would face payment restrictions based on their distance from another hospital. The changes would apply beginning January 1, 2027.
Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act.
(B) that— (i) during the period beginning January 1, 2014, and ending December 26, 2020— (I) was a critical access hospital; or (II) was a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B)) located in a county (or equivalent unit of local government) in a rural area (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D)); and (ii) as of the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, had ceased operations.
(other than a facility described in section 1861(kkk)(3)(B) that, as of the date on which such facility submits an application under section 1866(j) to enroll under this title as a rural emergency hospital, is located less than 10 miles away from the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, or rural emergency hospital)
The bill would add an eligibility route for facilities that had ceased operations by enactment. During January 1, 2014, through December 26, 2020, they must have been either a critical access hospital—a statutory hospital category—or a hospital in the separately defined “subsection (d)” category located in a rural county or equivalent local area. The referenced definitions are not supplied.
Check the source
(B) that— (i) during the period beginning January 1, 2014, and ending December 26, 2020— (I) was a critical access hospital; or (II) was a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B)) located in a county (or equivalent unit of local government) in a rural area (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D)); and (ii) as of the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, had ceased operations.
For the rural emergency hospital definition, the bill would replace the words “is enrolled under section 1866(j)” with an exception for the newly eligible closed facilities. Because the surrounding existing provision is not reproduced, this textual change does not establish a blanket exemption from Medicare enrollment requirements.
Check the source
(1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking is enrolled under section 1866(j) and inserting except in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(B)
The newly eligible closed facilities would receive exceptions in two existing provisions: one concerning an action plan and another in section 1861(kkk)(4)(B)(i). The bill does not reproduce the full requirements, so the precise obligations removed cannot be fully described from this source.
Check the source
(3) in paragraph (4)— (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking An action plan and inserting Except in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(B), an action plan; and (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting except in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(B), before the facility.
A newly eligible closed facility would not receive the payment increase referenced in section 1834(x)(1) if it were less than 35 miles from the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, or rural emergency hospital when it applied to enroll as a rural emergency hospital. The source does not state the increase's amount.
Check the source
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting , except that, in the case of a facility described in section 1861(kkk)(3)(B) that, as of the date on which such facility submits an application under section 1866(j) to enroll under this title as a rural emergency hospital, is located less than 35 miles away from the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, or rural emergency hospital, such increase shall not apply before the period at the end
A separate payment restriction would exclude a newly eligible closed facility from section 1834(x)(2)(A) if it were less than 10 miles from the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, or rural emergency hospital when it applied to enroll. The existing payment provision is not reproduced, so its payment type and amount cannot be established here.
Check the source
(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting (other than a facility described in section 1861(kkk)(3)(B) that, as of the date on which such facility submits an application under section 1866(j) to enroll under this title as a rural emergency hospital, is located less than 10 miles away from the nearest hospital, critical access hospital, or rural emergency hospital) after rural emergency hospital.
The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated March 17, 2026, records introduction in the House on March 3, 2025, and referral that day to the Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce committees. It supplies no later action and does not establish whether the bill subsequently advanced or became law.
2025-03-03: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish what appears in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; the source set does not establish formal earmark status in accompanying materials.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
Findings to examine
The supplied text contains express exceptions for a narrowly defined group within the bill's main policy. Classification as a targeted benefit does not establish that the exceptions are improper.
Facilities that operated in the specified hospital categories during January 1, 2014, through December 26, 2020, and had ceased operations by enactment would receive special exceptions in the existing action-plan provision and section 1861(kkk)(4)(B)(i). These exceptions support the bill's expanded eligibility policy. Their full scope is uncertain because the underlying requirements are not reproduced.
Check the sources
(B) that— (i) during the period beginning January 1, 2014, and ending December 26, 2020— (I) was a critical access hospital; or (II) was a subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B)) located in a county (or equivalent unit of local government) in a rural area (as defined in section 1886(d)(2)(D)); and (ii) as of the date of the enactment of this subparagraph, had ceased operations.
(3) in paragraph (4)— (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking An action plan and inserting Except in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(B), an action plan; and (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting except in the case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(B), before the facility.
The supplied full text is the introduced House version dated March 3, 2025. Its provisions are proposals; the supplied history does not establish enactment or subsequent developments.
The existing Social Security Act provisions are not reproduced in full. Their definitions, surrounding eligibility and administrative requirements, and payment types and amounts cannot be fully explained from the supplied amendments alone.
The bundle contains no member earmark requests, disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or amendment attachment history. It cannot establish formal earmark status or the contents of other versions.
The supplied text specifies a start date but no expiration date or separate termination condition. It does not identify particular facilities that would qualify or establish fiscal, access, or health outcomes.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Mar 17, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI