PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.176 / 110th Congress

Shirley A. Chisholm United States-Caribbean Educational Exchange Act of 2008

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 968.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Sep 15, 2008

Shirley A. Chisholm United States-Caribbean Educational Exchange Act of 2008 - (Sec. 4) Authorizes the Secretary of State to establish the Shirley A. Chisholm United States-Caribbean Educational Exchange Program under which scholars and secondary, undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate students from Caribbean Community (CARICOM) countries (excluding countries with observer status or that support international terrorism) would attend U.S. schools or universities, participate in activities designed to promote a greater understanding of U.S. values and culture.

Sets forth program elements.

Directs the Secretary to monitor the program's effectiveness.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Expresses the sense of Congress that the Secretary should work with CARICOM countries to establish an educational exchange program under which U.S. secondary and higher education students study in CARICOM countries.

(Sec. 5) Authorizes the Secretary, through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), to establish a program to provide educational development assistance for CARICOM countries by: (1) enhancing teacher training; (2) strengthening curriculum and instructional materials; and (3) assisting improvements in school management and public administration of education.

Directs the Secretary to monitor the program's effectiveness.

(Sec. 6) States that to the maximum extent possible the programs under this Act should be implemented through private funding and through partnerships with appropriate U.S. organizations, institutions, and corporations. (Sec. 7) Directs the Secretary to report to the appropriate congressional committees on implementing plans for such programs.

(Sec. 8) Authorizes FY2008-FY2012 appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-9] · D–CA

Committees

  • Foreign Relations Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
58 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 968.

  2. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Reid for Senator Biden with amendments. With written report No. 110-463.

  3. Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Reid for Senator Biden with amendments. With written report No. 110-463.

  4. Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

  6. Received in the Senate.

  7. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 371 - 55 (Roll no. 771). (text: CR H8861-8863)

    House roll call 771 · Individual votes
  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 371 - 55 (Roll no. 771).(text: CR H8861-8863)

    House roll call 771 · Individual votes
  11. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9228-9229)

  12. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  13. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 176.

  14. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR 7/31/2007 H8861-8866)

  15. Mr. Faleomavaega moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 163.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 110-254.

  18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. H. Rept. 110-254.

  19. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.

  20. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  21. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.176 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.176 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.176 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.176 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources