Making emergency supplemental appropriations for Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 21, 1993

Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1993 - Title I: Emergency Supplemental Appropriations - Makes emergency supplemental appropriations to the Department of Labor for advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund and other funds to remain available until September 30, 1994. Title II: General Provisions - Prohibits such appropriations from remaining available beyond the date provided by this Act. Designates such funds as emergency requirements for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. McDade, Joseph M. [R-PA-10] · R–PA

Committees

Appropriations Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Michel, Robert H. [R-IL-18]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Apr 21, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Apr 21, 1993
Introduced in House
Apr 21, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Apr 21, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1742 · Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1993

Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1756 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1756, 103rd Congress: Making emergency supplemental appropriations for Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1756

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1756/BILLS-103hr1756ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:14Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.1756 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1756 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1756, 103rd Congress: Making emergency supplemental appropriations for Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1756

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1756/BILLS-103hr1756ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:14Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1756 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1756 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1756, 103rd Congress: Making emergency supplemental appropriations for Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1756

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1756/BILLS-103hr1756ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:14Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1756 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1756 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1756, 103rd Congress: Making emergency supplemental appropriations for Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1756

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-21.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1756/BILLS-103hr1756ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:14Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1756 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.