PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1752 / 119th Congress

Technology for Energy Security Act

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 2025

Technology for Energy Security Act

This bill extends the energy investment tax credit for qualified fuel cell property for eight years. 

Under current law, an energy investment tax credit of up to 30% of the cost of qualified fuel cell property is available provided construction of the qualified fuel cell property begins on or before December 31, 2024. This bill extends the energy investment tax credit to include qualified fuel cell property where construction begins on or before December 31, 2032.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24] · R–NY

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1752 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1752 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1752 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1752 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 4, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed Technology for Energy Security Act would move a date in the federal energy tax credit provision for fuel cell property from January 1, 2025, to January 1, 2033. This change would apply to property whose construction begins after December 31, 2024, affecting its treatment under that tax credit provision.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Technology for Energy Security Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
2 Extension of energy credit for quality fuel cell property (a) In general Section 48(c)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking January 1, 2025 and inserting January 1, 2033. (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to property the construction of which begins after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

How it would work

Section 2(a) would replace January 1, 2025, with January 1, 2033, in Internal Revenue Code section 48(c)(1)(E), moving the specified date eight years later.

Check the source
Section 48(c)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking January 1, 2025 and inserting January 1, 2033.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

The amendment would apply based on when construction begins: property would fall within its stated application period if construction begins after December 31, 2024.

Check the source
The amendments made by this section shall apply to property the construction of which begins after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

What the record shows

The supplied December 20, 2025, source snapshot records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 27, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-12-20T09:06:49Z. 2025-02-27: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. 2025-02-27: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-12-20T09:06:49Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for a particular recipient or place was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the contents of other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential exception beyond the main policy's intended coverage was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The existing tax-code provision is not reproduced. The bundle therefore does not establish the date's full statutory function, credit amount, eligibility requirements, exceptions, or administration and enforcement rules.
  • The analysis describes the supplied introduced proposal. The dated actions snapshot does not establish subsequent progress or enactment; missing actions do not prove that neither occurred.
  • No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Dec 20, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI