To make permanent the formula for determining fees for the grazing of livestock on public rangelands.

Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 20, 1993

Sets forth a formula, beginning with the 1991 grazing year, for determining fees for domestic livestock grazing on public rangelands. Bases the formula on the base established by the 1966 Western Livestock Grazing Survey, the Forage Value Index, and the adjusted Beef Cattle Price Index. Prohibits annual fee adjustments greater or less than 25 percent.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Vucanovich, Barbara F. [R-NV-2] · R–NV

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

23 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Jun 2, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
Apr 20, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Apr 20, 1993
Introduced in House
Apr 20, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Apr 20, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1602 · Public Rangeland Grazing Reform Act of 1993

Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1750 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1750, 103rd Congress: To make permanent the formula for determining fees for the grazing of livestock on public rangelands.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1750

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1750/BILLS-103hr1750ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.1750 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1750 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1750, 103rd Congress: To make permanent the formula for determining fees for the grazing of livestock on public rangelands.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1750

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1750/BILLS-103hr1750ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1750 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1750 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1750, 103rd Congress: To make permanent the formula for determining fees for the grazing of livestock on public rangelands.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1750

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1750/BILLS-103hr1750ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1750 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1750 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1750, 103rd Congress: To make permanent the formula for determining fees for the grazing of livestock on public rangelands.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1750

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-04-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1750/BILLS-103hr1750ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:24:19Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1750 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.