To authorize the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to make loans to assist units of local government acquire and maintain equipment for use in the enforcement of alcohol-related traffic laws, and for other purposes.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 20, 1993
Establishes in the Treasury the Alcohol-Related Traffic Laws Enforcement Fund. Makes amounts in the Fund available, as provided in appropriations Acts, to the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for making loans to units of local government. Specifies that such loans: (1) may only be used for acquiring and maintaining equipment (including breath testing devices and video surveillance cameras) for use in the enforcement of alcohol-related traffic laws and for training personnel of such units in the use of such equipment; and (2) shall be subject to specified terms and conditions. Requires all such equipment to be approved by the Administrator and the Governor of the State of which the unit is a part before being acquired. Sets forth provisions with respect to transfers to and management of the Fund. Authorizes appropriations.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1744 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1744 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1744 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1744 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.