PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.173 / 105th Congress

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to authorize donation of surplus Federal law enforcement canines to their handlers.

Became Public Law No: 105-27.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Apr 16, 1997

Amends the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to authorize Federal agency heads to donate, to an individual who has experience handling canines in the performance of law enforcement duties, surplus law enforcement canines determined to be no longer needed for official purposes.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-23] · R–CA

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 105-27.

  2. Became Public Law No: 105-27.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6788)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S6788)

  10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 102.

  11. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Thompson without amendment. Without written report.

  12. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Thompson without amendment. Without written report.

  13. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  14. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

  15. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  17. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  18. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1575-1576)

  21. Mr. Horn moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  22. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  24. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

  25. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  26. Referred to the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology.

  27. Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.

  28. Introduced in House

  29. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.173 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.173 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.173 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.173 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources