PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1727 / 103rd Congress

Arson Prevention Act of 1994

Became Public Law No: 103-254.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 13, 1993

Arson Prevention Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to direct the Administrator of the United States Fire Administration, through the Office of Fire Prevention and Arson Control, to carry out a demonstration program to provide two-year grants to States for programs relating to arson research, prevention, and control. Sets forth: (1) goals which the Administrator shall ensure are each embodied within one or more grant awards; (2) State funding requirements and additional renewal periods for such grants; and (3) sunset provisions. Expresses the sense of the Congress that grant recipients should purchase, when available and cost effective, American-made equipment and products when expending grant monies. Directs the Administrator, in allocating grants, to provide each recipient with a notice to that effect. Prohibits making funds available to a State or local government unless such government has a policy of actively promoting the training of its fire fighters in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Authorizes appropriations, including appropriations for the expansion of arson investigator training programs at the National Fire Academy, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Academy, or through regional delivery sites.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9] · D–VA

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
23 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-254.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-254.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S5380)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to the Senate amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S5380)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate amendment.

  11. House agreed to Senate amendment with amendment pursuant to H. Res. 413. (consideration: CR H2751-2754)

  12. Resolving differences -- House actions: House agreed to Senate amendment with amendment pursuant to H. Res. 413.(consideration: CR H2751-2754)

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Passed Senate in lieu of S. 798 with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 798 with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  16. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 798.

  17. Measure laid before Senate.

  18. Senate Committee on Commerce discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S16986)

  19. Senate Committee on Commerce discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S16986)

  20. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  24. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  25. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5081-5084)

  26. Mr. Boucher moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  27. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 96.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. H. Rept. 103-172.

  29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. H. Rept. 103-172.

  30. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  31. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  32. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).

  33. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  34. Referred to the Subcommittee on Science.

  35. Hearings Held Prior to Referral.

  36. Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

  37. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E948)

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1727 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1727 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1727 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1727 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources