PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 103-36.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 20, 1993
Central Intelligence Agency Voluntary Separation Pay Act - Authorizes the Director of Central Intelligence to establish a program under which employees may be offered separation pay to separate from service voluntarily, whether by retirement or resignation. Specifies that such separation pay: (1) may be offered only with the prior approval of the Director and to employees within such occupational groups or geographic locations, or subject to such other similar limitations, as the Director may require; (2) shall be paid in a lump sum, in a certain amount, and subject to specified treatment for purposes of computing Government benefits and determining severance pay based on any other separation; and (3) shall not be payable under this Act based on any separation occurring after September 30, 1997.
People & committees
Rep. Glickman, Dan [D-KS-4] · D–KS
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 103-36.
Became Public Law No: 103-36.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6616)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S6616)
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 73.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2694-2696)
Mr. Glickman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 52.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent). H. Rept. 103-102.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent). H. Rept. 103-102.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Legislation.
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent).
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E946)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1723 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1723 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1723 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1723 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.