PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1715 / 104th Congress

Respecting the relationship between workers' compensation benefits and the benefits available under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act.

Became Public Law No: 104-49.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 25, 1995

Amends the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act to provide that where State workers' compensation laws are applicable and provide coverage for a migrant or seasonal agricultural worker, workers' compensation benefits shall be the exclusive remedy for actual damages for loss from an injury or death of such a worker for all cases in which a final judgment has not been entered. Provides that this does not preclude recovery for statutory damages or an injunction under such Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Goodling, William F. [R-PA-19] · R–PA

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
55 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 104-49.

  2. Became Public Law No: 104-49.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S16440)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S16440)

  10. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 215.

  11. Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

  12. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  13. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  14. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  16. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10089-10093)

  17. Mr. Goodling moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  18. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 18.

  19. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  20. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1141)

  21. Referred to the House Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1715 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1715 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1715 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1715 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources