PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1713 / 118th Congress

DOE and USDA Interagency Research Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Dec 4, 2023

DOE and USDA Interagency Research Act

This bill requires the Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture to carry out cross-cutting and collaborative research and development activities through the establishment of an interagency agreement.

The agencies are authorized to (1) carry out reimbursable agreements in order to maximize research and development effectiveness, and (2) collaborate with other federal agencies. Further, the interagency agreement must require the use of a competitive, merit-reviewed process, which considers applications from federal agencies, national laboratories, institutions of higher education, and nonprofit institutions.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Research and development activities may include

collaborative research in a variety of focus areas, such as integrated natural resources and the energy-water nexus, biofuels and biobased products, invasive species management, grid modernization and security, rural technology development, and wildfire risks and prevention;

developing methods to accommodate large voluntary standardized and integrated data sets on agricultural, environmental, supply chain, and economic information;

supporting research infrastructure and workforce development; and

conducting collaborative research and development on ways to improve agriculture operations and processing efficiencies, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-OK-3] · R–OK

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6089-6090)

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6089-6090)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1713.

  6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6089-6090)

  7. Mr. Lucas moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 54.

  9. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 118-74, Part II.

  10. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Agriculture. H. Rept. 118-74, Part II.

  11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. H. Rept. 118-74, Part I.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. H. Rept. 118-74, Part I.

  13. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 53 - 1.

  14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  15. Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology Discharged.

  16. Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

  17. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 0.

  18. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  19. Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  20. Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  21. Introduced in House

  22. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1713 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1713 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1713 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1713 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources