PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1699 / 119th Congress

TOTAL Care Act

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 2025

TRICARE OBGYN Treatment and Access without Lags in Care Act or the TOTAL Care Act

This bill requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to implement a five-year pilot program under which female beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime may receive obstetrical and gynecological care without a referral. (Generally, the TRICARE Prime program requires a beneficiary to obtain a referral for care through a designated primary care manager.)

Under the pilot program, participating female beneficiaries may elect to designate an obstetrical or gynecological care provider under the TRICARE program (i.e., the various programs carried out by DOD, including TRICARE Prime) as an additional designated primary care manager.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4] · D–NV

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
16 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 9, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1699 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1699 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1699 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1699 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 3, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed TOTAL Care Act would create a five-year test program allowing female TRICARE Prime beneficiaries who opt in to receive obstetrical and gynecological care—care related to pregnancy and the female reproductive system—without the specified referral requirement. Participants could also choose a provider of that care as an additional primary care manager. The bill would require a report on enrollment and costs.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the TRICARE OBGYN Treatment and Access without Lags in Care Act or the TOTAL Care Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(1) the referral requirement in section 1095f(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, does not apply with respect to obstetrical and gynecological care for covered participants, including the ordering of related obstetrical and gynecological items and services; and (2) covered participants may elect to designate an obstetrical or gynecological care provider under the TRICARE program as an additional designated primary care manager under such section.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(b) Duration The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program for a period of five years.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(2) The term covered participant means a female beneficiary enrolled in TRICARE Prime who elects to participate in the pilot program.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(1) An assessment of any increases or decreases to TRICARE Prime enrollment during the period in which the Secretary carries out the pilot program. (2) An assessment of any changes in the associated costs of providing obstetrical and gynecological care under TRICARE Prime.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

How it would work

For participants, the pilot would waive the referral requirement identified in section 1095f(a)(1) of title 10 for obstetrical and gynecological care. The waiver would also cover ordering related items and services.

Check the source
(1) the referral requirement in section 1095f(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, does not apply with respect to obstetrical and gynecological care for covered participants, including the ordering of related obstetrical and gynecological items and services;
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

Participants could choose an obstetrical or gynecological care provider under TRICARE as an additional designated primary care manager. Making that designation would be optional.

Check the source
(2) covered participants may elect to designate an obstetrical or gynecological care provider under the TRICARE program as an additional designated primary care manager under such section.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

Within four years after enactment, the Secretary would have to report to the congressional defense committees. The report would assess increases or decreases in TRICARE Prime enrollment during the pilot and changes in the costs of providing obstetrical and gynecological care. It would also include other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.

Check the source
(c) Report Not later than four years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program that includes the following: (1) An assessment of any increases or decreases to TRICARE Prime enrollment during the period in which the Secretary carries out the pilot program. (2) An assessment of any changes in the associated costs of providing obstetrical and gynecological care under TRICARE Prime. (3) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated September 9, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Armed Services on February 27, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-09-09T08:05:25Z. 2025-02-27: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. 2025-02-27: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-09-09T08:05:25Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying disclosure and committee materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No special benefit beyond the pilot's ordinary intended coverage was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied text is the introduced version. The dated actions snapshot does not establish subsequent legislative action or enactment; the provisions are described as proposals.
  • The bundle does not reproduce the referenced statutes governing referrals, primary care managers, TRICARE definitions, or congressional defense committees. Their full scope and interaction with the proposal cannot be determined from this evidence.
  • No pilot results or cost estimates are supplied. The reporting requirement does not establish that enrollment, costs, or access would change in any particular direction.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 9, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI