PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1689 / 105th Congress

Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998

Laid on the table. See S. 1260 for further action. (consideration: CR H6121)

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Jul 22, 1998

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Title II: Reauthorization of the Securities and Exchange Commission Title III: Clerical and Technical Amendments Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 - Title I: Securities Litigation Uniform Standards - Amends the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit any private class action based upon State statutory or common law in State or Federal court by any private party alleging: (1) an untrue statement or omission in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security; or (2) that the defendant used any manipulative or deceptive device in connection with such a transaction. (Sec. 101) Declares that any class action brought in any State court involving a covered security shall be removable to the Federal district court for the district in which the action is pending. Exempts from such prohibition certain class actions based upon statutory or common law of the State in which the issuer is either incorporated or organized. Declares that such a class action may be maintained in State or Federal court by a private party if it involves: (1) the purchase or sale of securities by the issuer (or an affiliate) exclusively from or to holders of the issuer's equity securities; or (2) any communication about such a sale made by or on behalf of the issuer (or an affiliate) to such equity security holders concerning their decisions with respect to voting their securities, acting in response to a tender or exchange offer, or exercising dissenters' or appraisal rights. Declares that nothing precludes a State, any political subdivision, or a State pension plan from bringing an action involving a covered security either on its own behalf, or as a member of a class composed solely of other States, political subdivisions, or State pension plans that are named plaintiffs and have authorized participation in such action. Permits a class action suit in State or Federal court to enforce a contractual agreement between an issuer and an indenture trustee to be maintained by a party to the agreement or a successor to such party. Requires the Federal court to remand an action to State court upon determining that such action may be maintained in State court. Retains the jurisdiction of a State securities commission to investigate and bring enforcement actions. Retains State court discretion to determine whether actions filed before should be joined, consolidated, or otherwise allowed to proceed as a single action. Authorizes the Federal court to stay private action discovery proceedings in State court in order to aid its jurisdiction or protect or effectuate its judgments if such discovery would be subject to a stay under this Act (thus precluding a private action to circumvent a Federal stay by proceeding in State court). (Sec. 102) Directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to: (1) seek to encourage the adoption of State laws providing for reciprocal enforcement by State securities commissions of subpoenas issued by a sister State securities commission to compel attendance, testimony, or production of documentation in connection with an alleged violation of State securities laws; (2) submit a status report on such reciprocity to the Congress; and (3) include in certain annual reports the impact of the Federal preemption created by this Act upon the public interest and securities investors. Title II: Reauthorization of the Securities and Exchange Commission - Authorizes appropriations for the SEC for FY 1999. (Sec. 202) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to repeal certification, filing, and reporting requirements governing the electronic data gathering, analysis, and retrieval system (EDGAR). Title III: Clerical and Technical Amendments - Makes technical and conforming amendments to laws affected by this Act. (Sec. 302) Amends the Securities Act of 1933 to provide that securities subject to certain State hearings are exempt from Federal registration requirements.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. White, Rick [R-WA-1] · R–WA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
232 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Laid on the table. See S. 1260 for further action. (consideration: CR H6121)

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 340 - 83, 1 Present (Roll No. 318).

    House roll call 318 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 340 - 83, 1 Present (Roll No. 318).

    House roll call 318 · Individual votes
  5. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6119-6120)

  6. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  7. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  8. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6052-6064)

  9. Mr. Bliley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  10. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 361.

  11. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 105-640.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Commerce. H. Rept. 105-640.

  13. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  14. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  15. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 4.

  16. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  18. Referred to the Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials.

  19. Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.

  20. Introduced in House

  21. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1689 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1689 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1689 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1689 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources