To require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study to identify Air Force property suitable for exchange to acquire land authorized for addition to Shaw Air Force Base in the State of South Carolina.

For Further Action See H.R.1119.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 20, 1997

Amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 to direct the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study and report to the Congress on Air Force real property which would be suitable for a land exchange to enable the Air Force to acquire certain real property additions to Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Spratt, John M., Jr. [D-SC-5] · D–SC

Committees

Armed Services Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Nov 18, 1997
For Further Action See H.R.1119.
Jun 5, 1997
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Installations and Facilities.
Jun 5, 1997
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
May 20, 1997
Referred to the House Committee on National Security.
May 20, 1997
Introduced in House
May 20, 1997
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · May 20, 1997 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1119 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998

Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1675 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1675, 105th Congress: To require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study to identify Air Force property suitable for exchange to acquire land authorized for addition to Shaw Air Force Base in the State of South Carolina.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1675

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1675/BILLS-105hr1675ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:12Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.1675 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1675 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1675, 105th Congress: To require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study to identify Air Force property suitable for exchange to acquire land authorized for addition to Shaw Air Force Base in the State of South Carolina.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1675

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1675/BILLS-105hr1675ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:12Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1675 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1675 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1675, 105th Congress: To require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study to identify Air Force property suitable for exchange to acquire land authorized for addition to Shaw Air Force Base in the State of South Carolina.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1675

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1675/BILLS-105hr1675ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:12Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1675 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1675 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1675, 105th Congress: To require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a study to identify Air Force property suitable for exchange to acquire land authorized for addition to Shaw Air Force Base in the State of South Carolina.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1675

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-20.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1675/BILLS-105hr1675ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-06-06T14:19:12Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1675 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.