Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 2025
Maintaining Investments in New Innovation Act
This bill requires drug products with genetically targeted technology to have had market approval for at least 11 years in order to qualify for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. (The program requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to negotiate the prices of certain prescription drugs under Medicare beginning in 2026. Among other requirements, drugs must have had market approval for at least 7 years (for drug products) or 11 years (for biologics) to qualify for negotiation.)
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 25, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1672 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1672 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1672 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1672 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 3, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The bill proposes a special timing rule for certain drugs that use gene-targeting technology. Within an existing legal definition of “qualifying single source drug,” these products would have an 11-year requirement instead of a 7-year requirement. The existing law is not reproduced, limiting what the supplied text establishes about when that period starts and what consequences follow.
Check the sources
2. Amendment to definition of qualifying single source drug Section 1192(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320f–1(e)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by inserting (or, in the case of an advanced drug product (as defined in paragraph (4)), 11 years) after 7 years;
The proposed 11-year exception would apply specifically to “advanced drug products” in paragraph (1)(A)(ii) of the existing definition. The amendment would retain the reference to 7 years and insert the exception after it.
Check the source
(1) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by inserting (or, in the case of an advanced drug product (as defined in paragraph (4)), 11 years) after 7 years;
An “advanced drug product” would mean a drug using genetically targeted technology, as defined in another federal law, that may change how a gene or its associated gene product functions. Covered changes include reducing, increasing, or activating that function; the definition requires the possibility of such a change, rather than a guaranteed result.
Check the source
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A)(ii), the term advanced drug product means a drug that incorporates or utilizes a genetically targeted technology (as defined in section 529A(c)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) that may result in the modulation (including suppression, up-regulation, or activation) of the function of a gene or its associated gene product.
The supplied action snapshot, updated September 25, 2026, records introduction in the House on February 27, 2025, and referral that day to the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees.
2025-02-27: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying earmark materials are not supplied.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
Findings to examine
The text contains a narrow category-specific timing exception. Its full practical benefit cannot be established without the surrounding statutory context.
The proposed exception singles out advanced drug products using qualifying gene-targeting technology for an 11-year requirement instead of 7 years. This special treatment is the bill’s central policy, and its scope depends partly on a definition in another law.
Check the sources
(1) in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), by inserting (or, in the case of an advanced drug product (as defined in paragraph (4)), 11 years) after 7 years;
the term advanced drug product means a drug that incorporates or utilizes a genetically targeted technology (as defined in section 529A(c)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) that may result in the modulation (including suppression, up-regulation, or activation) of the function of a gene or its associated gene product.
The bundle supplies the complete introduced bill, but not the existing Social Security Act provision being amended. It therefore does not establish the timing trigger, surrounding eligibility rules, or full practical consequences of the proposed exception.
The referenced statutory definition of genetically targeted technology is not supplied, preventing a complete assessment of which drugs would qualify.
The introduced text contains no express implementation date, termination condition, or separate administration or enforcement provisions.
The supplied action snapshot records introduction and referrals but does not establish later advancement or enactment. Missing later actions do not prove that neither occurred.
No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 25, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI