PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1670 / 104th Congress

Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1995

For Further Action See S.1124.

Official summary

Version 18 · Reported to House amended, Part I · Aug 1, 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Competition Title II: Commercial Items Title III: Additional Reform Provisions Title IV: Streamlining of Dispute Resolution Title V: Effective Dates and Implementation Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1995 - Title I: Competition - Amends the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (FPASA), the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (OFPPA), and other Federal law to revise the standard for full and open competition for procurement of goods and services to provide for open access to bidding consistent with the need to efficiently fulfill the armed forces' and executive agencies' needs. Requires the use of sealed bids or competitive proposals. Revises requirements for the use of other than competitive procedures to allow them only when use of competitive procedures is not feasible or appropriate, for which standards shall be set forth in the Federal Acquisitions Regulation (FAR). Requires the FAR to provide for justification and approval of sole source procurements under standards that set forth limited circumstances, including specified current standards. Mandates the creation of simplified procedures for procurements valued below a certain amount ("simplified acquisition threshold"). Amends OFPPA to revise public notice requirements for all government contracts valued between $10,000 and $25,000 as well as those valued at over $25,000. Requires such notice to state whether the acquisition is to be conducted pursuant to a contractor verification system, or whether the offeror, its product, or its service otherwise must meet certain eligibility requirements. (Sec. 104) Entitles an excluded offeror, who has submitted a competitive proposal, to request in writing and receive from the contracting officer a debriefing about the offer's merits prior to award, unless it is not in the Government's best interests to conduct a debriefing at that time. (Sec. 105) Repeals the small business set-aside requirements with respect to the award of architectural and engineering contracts for military construction, family housing project, or other Department of Defense (DOD) or military department purposes. Subjects such awards to the Brooks Architect-Engineers Act. (Sec. 106) Requires the creation of a contractor verification system of competitive procedures to verify the eligibility of contractors according to certain criteria to compete for contracts furnishing property or services on a recurring basis. Requires that all interested sources have a fair opportunity to be considered for verification. Title II: Commercial Items - Amends Federal law with respect to exceptions to the requirement that certain offerors, contractors, and subcontractors submit cost or pricing data. Specifies that such submissions shall not be required for the acquisition of a commercial item (currently, any contract for which the price agreed upon is based on established catalog or market prices of commercial items sold in substantial quantities to the general public). (Sec. 201) Limits the collection of information used to determine the fairness of a price by eliminating the Government's authority to: (1) audit books and records related to cost and pricing; and (2) demand data other than certified cost or pricing data. Repeals the requirement that cost and pricing data be sought from the offeror, contractor, or other sources when competition is not practicable. (Sec. 202) Requires the FAR to provide for special simplified procedures for the purchase of commercial items. Prohibits the procurement from a single source of commercial items valued above the simplified acquisition threshold unless a written justification is approved. (Sec. 204) Repeals the requirement that mandatory cost accounting methods be used in Federal acquisition of commercial goods. Title III: Additional Reform Provisions - Eliminates certain certification requirements for government suppliers, and prohibits future creation of such certification requirements unless: (1) specifically imposed by statute; or (2) approved by either the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy (Administrator) or the head of an executive agency. (Sec. 303) Permits testing of alternative and innovative procurement policies for five years. (Sec. 304) Repeals mandatory charges for research, development, and production costs of U.S. defense products sold abroad, provided that lost funds are offset by legislated cuts in the President's budget. (Sec. 305) Establishes civil and criminal penalties for unauthorized disclosures or acquisitions of bid, proposal, or source selection information regarding a Government procurement. Eliminates: (1) anti-bribery provisions; (2) requirements for reports by defense contractors; (3) restrictions on private employment of former Federal employees by private entities to assist in obtaining Government contracts; and (4) criminal penalties imposed upon retired military officers who within two years after release from active duty receive compensation for representation in the sale of anything to the United States through the military department in which the officer is retired. (Sec. 306) Eliminates the requirement that the Office of Federal Procurement Policy report to the Congress annually and before the effective date of any policy or regulation. (Sec. 307) Requires the Secretary of Defense (DOD Secretary) to include in his annual report to Congress a justification for continuing any acquisition program that fails to meet certain percentages of specified goals. (Sec. 308) Specifies incentives the DOD Secretary and the Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget are to use in promoting acquisition program goals. (Sec. 309) Directs the DOD Secretary to ensure that DOD regulations compress the time needed to develop and procure new systems. (Sec. 310) Directs the Administrator to establish a goal of a 50 percent reduction in executive agency procurement. (Sec. 311) Amends the FPASA and other Federal law to require multiyear contracting. (Sec. 312) Requires the FAR to permit: (1) rewarding a Government contractor for exceeding the contract cost, schedule, or performance parameters to the benefit of the United States; or (2) penalizing the contractor for failing to adhere to such parameters to the detriment of the United States. (Sec. 313) Amends Federal law to require the Secretary to submit a report before every phase of an acquisition program detailing that phase's goals and budgetary needs before the Congress makes funding available. (Sec. 314) Directs the Comptroller General to: (1) review commercial practices regarding accounts payable and develop standards for the DOD Secretary to consider using to improve DOD contract payment procedures and financial management systems; and (2) report to the Congress on the effectiveness of such procedures and systems. (Sec. 315) Amends Federal law to require that DOD policies and procedures provide that education and training in acquisition and past performance of acquisition responsibilities are major factors in the selection of personnel for acquisition positions. (Sec. 316) Amends the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 to establish a Joint Standoff Weapon Unitary Variant pilot program with respect to all contracts directly related to the development and procurement of an air-delivered, standoff weapon that incorporates a global positioning system-aided inertial navigation system, a data link capability, and a unitary warhead. Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) implement a defense facility-wide pilot program to determine the potential for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process in certain facilities; and (2) exempt related contracts or subcontracts from specified cost or pricing data and mandatory cost accounting standards requirements. (Sec. 317) Amends the OFPPPA to require executive agencies to establish value engineering procedures and processes for certain programs. (Sec. 318) Directs the head of each executive agency, under the direction of the Administrator, to establish policies and procedures (including accession, education, training, career development, and performance incentives requirements) to effectively manage and promote a professional acquisition work force. Title IV: Streamlining of Dispute Resolution - Amends the OFPPA to replace the various Federal boards of contract appeals with a Department of Defense Board of Contract Appeals and, in the General Services Administration, a Civilian Board of Contract Appeals ("Boards"). Authorizes appropriations. (Sec. 421) Requires the Boards to provide informal voluntary alternative dispute resolution services upon request of all parties in conflict over specific granted or prospective Government procurement contracts. (Sec. 423) Grants jurisdiction to the Boards to resolve specific contract disputes. (Sec. 424) Requires the Boards to review, upon a timely protest by an interested party, whether a procurement decision by an executive agency head was arbitrary, capricious, or in violation of statute or regulation. Prohibits the award of any contract after notice of such a protest unless the head of the procuring activity: (1) determines that urgent and compelling circumstances which significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the decision; and (2) notifies the respective Board of that determination. Permits a contracting officer to suspend performance of a contract if: (1) a protest is likely to be filed; and (2) immediate performance is not in the best interests of the United States. Requires that performance of a contract stop upon a timely protest unless the head of the procuring activity: (1) determines that urgent and compelling circumstances which significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the decision; and (2) notifies the respective Board of that determination. Limits the parties' discovery, and creates time-frames for certain specified Board procedures. Requires specified simplified procedures to be followed in disputes regarding contracts valued below $20 million unless a Chairman determines otherwise. Requires both the dismissal of frivolous protests brought or pursued in bad faith, and in specified circumstances, the payment of costs by a protesting party. Permits the Boards to implement specified corrective actions deemed necessary and appropriate to arrest the violation of a regulation or statute. Allows: (1) the granting of relief authorized by regulation or statute in addition to those specified; (2) the filing of a protest or an action in a specified alternative forum; and (3) appeal of the Board's judgement according to specified procedures. (Sec. 425) Limits the authority of the Boards to: (1) contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold; and (2) contracts for the procurement of commercial items. (Sec. 443) Amends the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 and other Federal law to conform to this Act. Title V: Effective Dates and Implementation - Establishes the effective date of this Act and a schedule for implementing regulations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Clinger, William F., Jr. [R-PA-5] · R–PA

Committees

  • Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
  • Small Business Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Armed Services Committee
16 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. For Further Action See S.1124.

  2. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

  3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  4. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 423 - 0 (Roll no. 663).

    House roll call 663 · Individual votes
  5. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 423 - 0 (Roll no. 663).

    House roll call 663 · Individual votes
  6. The previous question was ordered without objection.

  7. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  8. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8915-8937)

  9. Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1670 as unfinished business.

  10. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.

  11. The Speaker designated the Honorable Jerry Weller to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  12. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 219 and Rule XXIII.

  13. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1670 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. The amendment shall be considered by title rather than by section. The first two sections and each title shall be considered as read. Points of order against the amendment shall be waived. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone votes until a time during further consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole.

  14. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 219. (consideration: CR H8857-8887)

  15. Rule H. Res. 219 passed House.

  16. Committee on Small Business discharged.

  17. Committee on Small Business discharged.

  18. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Small Business for a period ending not later than Sept. 12, 1995 for consideration of such portions of sections 101(d) and 102(b) of the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee pursuant to clause 1(o), rule X.

  19. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 219 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1670 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight. The amendment shall be considered by title rather than by section. The first two sections and each title shall be considered as read. Points of order against the amendment shall be waived. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone votes until a time during further consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole.

  20. House Committee on Judiciary Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 2, 1995.

  21. House Committee on National Security Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Oct. 2, 1995.

  22. House Committee on National Security Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Aug. 2, 1995.

  23. House Committee on Judiciary Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Aug. 2, 1995.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 104-222, Part I.

  25. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Government Reform. H. Rept. 104-222, Part I.

  26. Mr. Clinger asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Government Operations have until midnight on Aug. 1 to file a report on H.R. 1670. Agreed to without objection.

  27. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  28. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  29. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

  30. Joint Hearings Held by the Committee on National Security and by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.

  31. Joint Hearings Held by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and by the Committee on National Security.

  32. Executive Comment Requested from DOD.

  33. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1077-1079)

  34. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committees on National Security, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  35. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committees on National Security, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  36. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committees on National Security, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  37. Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committees on National Security, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  38. Introduced in House

  39. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1670 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1670 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1670 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1670 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources