PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1668 / 119th Congress

End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 2025

End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act

This bill prohibits the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from carrying out the Shelter and Services Program (SSP) and rescinds unobligated funds transferred to FEMA for this purpose for FY2023-FY2024. 

The SSP provides grants to public and nonprofit entities for temporarily providing shelter and other services (e.g., food, transportation) to noncitizen migrants released from Department of Homeland Security custody and awaiting immigration court proceedings, as well as for increasing grant recipients’ capacity to temporarily shelter such individuals (e.g., modifying existing facilities).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Cloud, Michael [R-TX-27] · R–TX

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Financial Services Committee
  • Appropriations Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1668 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1668 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1668 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1668 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 3, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This bill would bar the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from supporting sheltering and related work by organizations outside the federal government when that work helps relieve overcrowding in Customs and Border Protection’s short-term holding facilities. It would also cancel specified funds previously transferred to FEMA that have not yet been committed to spending.

Check the sources
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may not carry out any program to support sheltering and related activities provided by non-Federal entities, including facility improvements and construction, in support of relieving overcrowding in short-term holding facilities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
The unobligated balances of the following amounts are rescinded:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

How it would work

The prohibition would apply to FEMA’s Administrator and cover any program serving the stated sheltering and overcrowding-relief purpose, including facility improvements and construction. Its operative language defines the restriction by the program’s purpose; it does not establish an individual immigration-status eligibility test.

Check the source
(a) Prohibition The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may not carry out any program to support sheltering and related activities provided by non-Federal entities, including facility improvements and construction, in support of relieving overcrowding in short-term holding facilities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

The bill would cancel the remaining uncommitted balances of specified transfers to FEMA under the 2023 and 2024 appropriations laws. Both references identify money under Customs and Border Protection’s “operations and support” heading. This cancellation is limited to unobligated balances, meaning funds not yet legally committed.

Check the sources
(b) Rescission The unobligated balances of the following amounts are rescinded:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(1) The amounts made available and transferred to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the matter under the heading operations and support under the heading U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the heading security, enforcement, and investigations in title II of division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (Public Law 117–328; 136 Stat. 4730).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
(2) The amounts made available and transferred to the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the matter under the heading operations and support under the heading U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the heading security, enforcement, and investigations in title II of division C of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (Public Law 118–47; 138 Stat. 598).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated January 8, 2026, records introduction in the House on February 27, 2025. It also records referrals that day to the Appropriations, Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure committees and to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-01-08T15:56:21Z.
Official legislative record · 2026-01-08T15:56:21Z
2025-02-27: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-01-08T15:56:21Z
2025-02-27: Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2026-01-08T15:56:21Z
2025-02-27: Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Official legislative record · 2026-01-08T15:56:21Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish the contents or attachment history of other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and accompanying committee materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow benefit, preferential exemption, or special carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • This analysis covers the complete supplied introduced text dated February 27, 2025. Its provisions are proposals, not evidence of enacted law. The January 8, 2026 actions snapshot does not establish later legislative developments; missing actions do not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
  • The referenced appropriations provisions are not reproduced. The bundle does not establish their full terms, the remaining unobligated balances, the dollar amount that would be canceled, or the particular organizations affected.
  • The introduced text supplies no separate implementation date, sunset, express exception, or detailed enforcement procedure.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jan 8, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI