PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Financial Services, H. Rept. 112-93, Part II.
Congressional Research Service
Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · May 27, 2011
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Transfer Clarification Act - Amends the the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to require the calendar date for the transfer of certain consumer financial protection functions from specified existing agencies to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) to be the later of: (1) the date that would have been designated, but for application of this Act, and (2) the date on which the Director of the Bureau is confirmed by the Senate.
People & committees
Rep. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV-2] · R–WV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Financial Services, H. Rept. 112-93, Part II.
Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Financial Services, H. Rept. 112-93, Part II.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 51.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 112-93.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 112-93.
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 26.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 8 .
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Hearings Held Prior to Introduction.
Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Prior to Introduction and Referral.
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1667 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1667 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1667 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1667 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.