PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1654 / 119th Congress

CUTS Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4] · R–FL

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Appropriations Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

    2. Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    3. Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    4. Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    5. Introduced in House

    6. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1654 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1654 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1654 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1654 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 3, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This proposal would cancel federal funding that has not yet been legally committed to spending. It targets remaining COVID-19 relief money, subject to a ceiling, and separately cancels remaining funding for specified education and transportation programs. Agencies and recipients relying on those funds could be affected, but the text does not identify individual recipients or calculate the amounts that would be canceled.

    Check the sources
    The unobligated balances of any COVID–19 relief funds are hereby rescinded to the extent that the sum of such rescinded funds does not exceed the total amount appropriated under the following Acts:
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
    (b) Infrastructure Rescissions Any unobligated funds appropriated to any of the following are hereby rescinded: (1) The Education Stabilization Fund under the heading Department of Education in title VIII of division B of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136; 134 Stat. 564). (2) The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program established in section 149 of title 23, United States Code. (3) The Carbon Reduction Program established in section 175 of title 23, United States Code. (4) The PROTECT Program established in section 176 of title 23, United States Code.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    How it would work

    Section 1 gives the proposal three alternative short titles: the Cutting Unobligated Tumultuous Spending Act, the CUTS Act, and the De-Supplemental Act.

    Check the source
    1. Short titles This Act may be cited as any of the following: (1) The Cutting Unobligated Tumultuous Spending Act. (2) The CUTS Act. (3) The De-Supplemental Act.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    Section 2(a) would rescind—cancel the authority to spend—uncommitted COVID-19 relief balances. The combined cancellation could not exceed the total funding appropriated by the three listed 2024 security supplemental laws for Israel, Ukraine, and the Indo-Pacific. Those laws supply the ceiling; this provision targets COVID-19 relief funds.

    Check the source
    (a) COVID–19 Rescissions (1) In general The unobligated balances of any COVID–19 relief funds are hereby rescinded to the extent that the sum of such rescinded funds does not exceed the total amount appropriated under the following Acts: (A) The Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (Division A of Public Law 118–50). (B) The Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (Division B of Public Law 118–50). (C) The Indo-Pacific Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (division C of Public Law 118–50).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    The proposal defines covered COVID-19 relief funds by six legislative sources: the 2020 coronavirus preparedness law, the CARES Act, the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, divisions M and N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The definition includes money appropriated or otherwise made available by those sources.

    Check the source
    (2) COVID–19 relief funds defined In this section, the term COVID–19 relief funds means any funds appropriated or otherwise made available by— (A) the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116–123); (B) the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136); (C) the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (Public Law 116–139); (D) the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (Division M of Public Law 116–260); (E) division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260); or (F) the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117–2).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    Section 2(b) would separately cancel any uncommitted funds appropriated to the Education Stabilization Fund under the cited CARES Act provision. This subsection states no dollar ceiling for that cancellation.

    Check the source
    (b) Infrastructure Rescissions Any unobligated funds appropriated to any of the following are hereby rescinded: (1) The Education Stabilization Fund under the heading Department of Education in title VIII of division B of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136; 134 Stat. 564).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    Section 2(b) would also cancel any uncommitted funds appropriated to three transportation programs: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement, Carbon Reduction, and PROTECT. The subsection states no dollar ceiling or restriction to a particular appropriations year for these cancellations.

    Check the sources
    (b) Infrastructure Rescissions Any unobligated funds appropriated to any of the following are hereby rescinded:
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27
    (2) The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program established in section 149 of title 23, United States Code. (3) The Carbon Reduction Program established in section 175 of title 23, United States Code. (4) The PROTECT Program established in section 176 of title 23, United States Code.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-27

    What the record shows

    The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated September 2, 2025, records introduction in the House on February 27, 2025. It also records referrals that day to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, and to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

    Check the sources
    Source snapshot updated 2025-09-02T17:43:46Z.
    Official legislative record · 2025-09-02T17:43:46Z
    2025-02-27: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-09-02T17:43:46Z
    2025-02-27: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
    Official legislative record · 2025-09-02T17:43:46Z
    2025-02-27: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Appropriations, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
    Official legislative record · 2025-09-02T17:43:46Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text; its substantive provisions concern funding cancellations. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish the contents or attachment history of other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and accompanying committee materials were not supplied.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No narrow beneficiary exemption, preferential treatment, or special carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The supplied full text is the introduced version, not evidence of enacted law. The September 2, 2025 actions snapshot does not establish subsequent progress or enactment; missing actions do not prove that neither occurred.
    • The referenced appropriations laws and program statutes are not reproduced. The bundle does not establish the numerical ceiling, remaining uncommitted balances, detailed program rules, or amounts that particular recipients would lose.
    • The text does not specify how to select COVID-19 balances if available funds exceed the ceiling, or how to account for overlap between the CARES Act funds covered by subsection (a) and the Education Stabilization Fund cancellation in subsection (b).
    • The bill provides no separate implementation date, expiration date, administering official, or detailed enforcement procedure. The supplied text does not establish how agencies would carry out the cancellations.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 2, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI