PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Youth and Families.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 29, 1999
Parental Consent Drug Testing and Counseling Act - Authorizes the Secretary of Education to make grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) to enable each local educational agency (LEA) to develop and implement a random drug testing and counseling program on school premises for students in grades nine through 12.Authorizes parents to determine whether their children participate in such programs.Sets forth requirements for State and local allocations and administrative costs.Requires LEAs receiving grants to make certain certifications to SEAs.Sets forth required and optional uses of grant funds.Requires LEAs receiving such grant funds to inform parents about: (1) the random drug testing program, in detail; (2) their option to enroll their child in such program; (3) the counseling program and the services it offers; (4) any positive results of a drug test of their child who participates in the program; and (5) the refusal of their child to take a drug test or participate in the counseling program, if applicable. Requires such LEAs to provide for confidentiality of drug test results.Authorizes appropriations.Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to require any LEA that receives ESEA funds to implement a drug testing and counseling program that meets the requirements of this Act.
People & committees
Rep. Rogan, James E. [R-CA-27] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Youth and Families.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1642 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1642 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1642 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1642 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.