PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 25, 2015
Charter School Transparency, Accountability, and Quality Act
Amends part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to require a state's school improvement plan to include assurances that its authorized public chartering agencies:
meet nationally recognized professional standards;
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
annually file and disclose independently audited financial statements for the charter schools they authorize,
adopt and enforce employee compensation and conflict of interest guidelines for such schools, and
enter into a legally binding charter or performance contract with each such school that bases charter renewal and revocation decisions on the state's school improvement accountability system.
Requires each state that seeks a grant under part B (Public Charter Schools) of title V of the ESEA to:
ensure that each charter school in the state makes available to the public information on student support services and annual performance and enrollment data for specified student subgroups and the student body as a whole;
ensure that each charter school board in the state has the right to fiscally oversee the education management organization it contracts with;
work with charter schools to help them recruit, enroll, and retain traditionally underserved students;
ensure that each charter school that receives funds under the state's charter school grant program meets its students' educational needs; and
share best and promising practices between charter schools and other public schools.
Allows state grantees to use a weighted lottery to give slightly better chances for admission to educationally disadvantaged students.
Expands the eligibility criteria for each charter school to receive part B funds from its state for the purpose of assisting other schools in adapting the charter school's program, or of disseminating information about the charter school, to include:
community involvement in the school's development and operation;
three successful consecutive annual audits without any indication of fiscal difficulties, as defined by typical accounting standards; and
maintenance of a student population that is demographically similar to the local educational agency (LEA) that encompasses the school or is geographically closest to it.
Requires national studies on the impact of charter schools on the LEAs that encompass them or that are geographically closest to them.
People & committees
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1639 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1639 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1639 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1639 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.