PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 15, 1997
Higher Education Access and Affordability Act of 1997 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude from gross income distributions from a qualified State tuition program used for qualified higher education expenses (including room and board). (Sec. 3) Makes the employer-provided educational assistance program exclusion permanent. (Sec. 4) Establishes an income-based deduction of up to $2,500 per year for certain qualified higher education loan interest paid for a taxpayer, spouse, or dependent. Allows such deduction whether or not the taxpayer itemizes deductions. Sets forth reporting requirements. (Sec. 5) Allows penalty-free early withdrawals from individual retirement plans for higher education expenses of the taxpayer, spouse, child, grandchild, or ancestor of the taxpayer or spouse. (Sec. 6) Establishes nontaxable education investment accounts which shall permit annual contributions of not more than $1,500 for the account holder's qualified higher education costs. Subjects account distributions used for nonqualifying purposes to taxation, including an additional ten percent tax. Sets forth related reporting requirements.
People & committees
Rep. Johnson, Nancy L. [R-CT-6] · R–CT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
See H.R.2014.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E940)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1627 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1627 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1627 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1627 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.