PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 104-100.
Congressional Research Service
Version 44 · House disagreed to Senate amendment · Jan 5, 1996
Designates the United States Post Office building located at 24 Corliss Street, Providence, Rhode Island, as the Harry Kizirian Post Office Building.
People & committees
Rep. Reed, Jack [D-RI-2] · D–RI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 104-100.
Became Public Law No: 104-100.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate receded from its amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S102)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate receded from its amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S102)
Message on House action received in Senate and at the desk:.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
House disagreed to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H307)
Resolving differences -- House actions: House disagreed to the Senate amendments Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H307)
Mr. McHugh asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendments.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2947 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Amendment SP 2947 proposed by Senator Frist for Senator Stevens.
Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S15589-15591)
Received in the Senate, read twice.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10093-10094)
Mr. McHugh moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Postal Service.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4792)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1606 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1606 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1606 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1606 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.