PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1601 / 104th Congress

International Space Station Authorization Act of 1995

Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Sep 28, 1995

International Space Station Authorization Act of 1995 - Authorizes appropriations through FY 2002 to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for complete development and initial operations of the International Space Station. Caps appropriations for any one fiscal year. Makes appropriations contingent upon the Administrator of NASA certifying that Space Station budgetary, schedule, and technical commitments will be met. Requires a report to the Congress if such certification cannot be made. Authorizes the Administrator to purchase the Clear Lake Development Facility, containing the Sonny Carter Training Facility, Texas. Provides for coordination of the Space Shuttle program with the Space Station Program Office. States that a priority goal of building the International Space Station is the economic development of Earth orbital space. Requires a related commercialization market study. Expresses the sense of the Congress that the "cost incentive fee" single prime contract for the International Space Station and the consolidation of program management and financial accountability into a single Space Station Program Office should be applied throughout the civil space program. Requires the Administrator to submit to the Congress an annual Space Station report, including accounting of all payments to Russia.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Walker, Robert S. [R-PA-16] · R–PA

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by voice vote.

  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by voice vote.

  5. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  6. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1601.

  7. The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

  8. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9606-9608)

  9. Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1601 as unfinished business.

  10. On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.

  11. Mr. Walker moved that the committee rise.

  12. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.

  13. The Speaker designated the Honorable David L. Hobson to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  14. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 228 and Rule XXIII.

  15. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1601 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments.

  16. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 228. (consideration: CR H9560-9566)

  17. Rule H. Res. 228 passed House.

  18. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 228 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1601 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments.

  19. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 109.

  20. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 104-210.

  21. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science. H. Rept. 104-210.

  22. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 34 - 8.

  23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  24. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  25. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  26. Referred to the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics.

  27. Referred to the House Committee on Science.

  28. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E988)

  29. Introduced in House

  30. Introduced in House

  31. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics Prior to Introduction and Referral.

  32. Hearings Held by the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics Prior to Introduction and Referral.

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1601 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1601 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1601 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1601 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources