PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1596 / 119th Congress

To designate the U.S. National Poultry Research Center of the Department of Agriculture located in Athens, Georgia, as the "Abit Massey Poultry Research Center".

Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 26, 2025

This bill designates the Department of Agriculture U.S. National Poultry Research Center in Athens, Georgia, as the Abit Massey Poultry Research Center.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1] · R–GA

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
13 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1596 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1596 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1596 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1596 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 2, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-26 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The bill proposes renaming the Department of Agriculture’s U.S. National Poultry Research Center in Athens, Georgia, as the Abit Massey Poultry Research Center. It would also make references to the facility in federal laws, maps, regulations, and other federal records refer to the new name.

Check the sources
The U.S. National Poultry Research Center of the Department of Agriculture located in Athens, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the Abit Massey Poultry Research Center.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-26
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Abit Massey Poultry Research Center.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-26

How it would work

The reference rule would treat existing federal references to the facility as references to its new name; it does not expressly require physically replacing documents, maps, or other records.

Check the source
Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Abit Massey Poultry Research Center.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-26

What the record shows

The supplied April 7, 2025 source snapshot records introduction and referral to the House Committee on Agriculture on February 26, 2025, followed by referral to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry on March 20, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-04-07T18:21:25Z. 2025-03-20: Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry. 2025-02-26: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture. 2025-02-26: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-04-07T18:21:25Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-26. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version and does not establish what other versions or accompanying materials contain.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow exemption, carve-out, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied text is the introduced version, not evidence of enacted law. The actions snapshot does not establish what happened after April 7, 2025, including whether the bill later advanced or became law.
  • The text specifies no implementation date, termination condition, or funding for carrying out the renaming.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Apr 7, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI