PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1579 / 119th Congress

Broadband Buildout Accountability Act

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 25, 2025

Broadband Buildout Accountability Act

This bill makes actions or decisions of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration concerning the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program subject to the Freedom of Information Act, which governs the release of federal documents.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11] · R–TX

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1579 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1579 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1579 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1579 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 2, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-25 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The Broadband Buildout Accountability Act proposes applying the Freedom of Information Act, the federal public-records law, to the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program, as described in section 2’s heading. It would insert an explicit FOIA exception into an existing statutory provision. Because that provision is not reproduced, the supplied text does not establish the full scope of program records or entities that would be covered.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Broadband Buildout Accountability Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-25
2. Applicability of FOIA to the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program Section 60102(o)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (47 U.S.C. 1702(o)(2)) is amended by inserting after Act’) the following: , except for section 552 of that title (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-25

How it would work

Section 2 would amend section 60102(o)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act by inserting an exception for section 552, identified as the Freedom of Information Act, immediately after “Act’)”. This is a proposed textual change, not evidence that the governing law has already changed.

Check the source
Section 60102(o)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (47 U.S.C. 1702(o)(2)) is amended by inserting after Act’) the following: , except for section 552 of that title (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-25

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated December 5, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on February 25, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-12-05T22:01:25Z. 2025-02-25: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. 2025-02-25: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-12-05T22:01:25Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-25. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No provision unrelated to the bill’s main subject or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; the source set cannot establish formal earmark status or absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow preferential benefit or special exemption for particular beneficiaries was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and the statutory context supplied; it does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The existing statutory provision being amended is not reproduced. The supplied evidence therefore does not fully establish the exception’s scope, which records or entities it would cover, or how existing disclosure exemptions and enforcement procedures would apply.
  • The introduced text supplies no separate implementation date, termination condition, funding provision, or administrative procedure.
  • The actions snapshot supplies no later legislative history or enactment evidence. This does not establish that the bill never advanced or was never enacted.
  • The category review covers only the complete supplied introduced version. Other versions, member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, and conference materials are not supplied.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Dec 5, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI